Human
Trafficking in the Sinai
In
the world of transnational organized crime, human trafficking is the fastest growing
business (Naim). Human trafficking involves the “recruitment, movement, and
delivery of migrants from a host to a destination state,” the migrants being “exploited
continuously after their delivery” (Shelly). One of the most terrible examples
of this is in Northeastern Africa in the Sinai desert. Human trafficking in
this region did not begin until 2009, but since then has grown rapidly and has
earned transnational criminals a great deal of money. It is a problem so
pervasive that it even earned a mention from President Obama in a speech at the
Clinton Global Initiative. A report released about a month ago by Tilburg
University based on over a hundred interviews of survivors details this brutal
practice.
Of
the many victims of human trafficking in the Sinai desert, about 95 percent are
Eritrean. Some sneak over the border to either Sudan or Ethiopia where they
hope to begin a better life. Once they arrive, they end up in camps where they can
obtain a legal status giving them the ability to work. However, while they are
waiting, they are often abducted by armed members of the Rashaida tribe. Other
Eritreans pay guides to smuggle them across the border and bring them safely to
towns in Ethiopia, Sudan, or Israel. However, there fates are the same, and the
smugglers instead bring these refugees over the border and sell them to
Rashaida tribesmen. Once the refugees have been taken hostage, the Rashaida
transport them to the Sinai where they are sold to Bedouin tribesmen.
This
is when the most harrowing part of the trafficking begins. While living in
atrocious conditions in Bedouin camps, ransom is demanded from hostages in
order to secure their release. They are given phones to call their relatives,
and once they have their relatives on the line they are subsequently tortured. Hostages,
which include women and children, are beaten, raped, electrocuted, and water
boarded as their family members listen. Family members are forced to hear the unimaginable
screams of pain inflicted upon their family members in order to motivate them
to raise money for their release.
Once
several of these calls take place, hostages’ families sometimes have raised
enough money to ensure their family member’s release, a sum which has recently
been as high $30,000-$50,000. Families often have to sell everything they have
in order to put together enough money. If the money is raised, hostages are
released. If it becomes apparent that the family of the hostage is too poor to
pay, then the hostage is usually killed within a few days.
This
phenomenon fits superbly with the description of transnational organized crime outlined
by Louise Shelly and his coauthors in their article Global Crime Inc. First,
human trafficking is in fact transnational organized crime because it fits all
of the requirements of the definition. An organized group is trafficking a
large amount of citizens of several states across multiple borders in order to
obtain financial payments in the form of ransom money from the relatives of the
hostages.
Next,
Shelly argues that transnational crime cannot continue unless there is the existence
of money laundering in order to bring illicit funds into the licit economy and
corruption so that those implicit in the criminal activities are not arrested. Both
of these exist in relation to human traffickers in the Sinai. One news agency
reports that “A network of financial laundering supports the ransom collection”
(Human Trafficking Devastating the Sinai). The tribesmen recruit Eritreans to
collect the ransom money from the families of the hostage takers. They then
bring this money to Israel where they launder it and transfer it back to the
hostage-takers. If this was not done, it would be impossible for groups to
continue their crimes because they would be unable to hold and invest their
money in the licit economy without it being noticed by government officials.
Corruption
is the second activity that must be present for transnational organized crime
to operate effectively. In Eritrea, this is extremely prevalent. First, the
Eritrean Border Surveillance Units are paid off by Eritreans so that they can safely
cross the border. Otherwise, the Surveillance Unit is instructed to shoot
anyone they see crossing the border. If the Surveillance Unit could not be
bought by Eritreans, they and their smugglers would be unable to cross the
border in the first place. However, reports indicate that the corruption in
Eritrea goes well above this. The involvement of “senior members of the
Eritrean security services … in the trafficking of weapons and people from
Eritrea into Egypt (the Sinai) via Sudan” is apparently quite prevalent (Human
Trafficking…). This gives Eritreans access to difficult to acquire exit visas.
However, as soon as they leave the country they are abducted by tribesmen
tipped off by government officials.
However,
in Sudan, Ethiopia, and Egypt where the rest of the smuggling takes place,
government corruption either does not take place or is yet to be uncovered. For
now, it appears that the governments of these states are too weak to deal with
human traffickers in any capacity and corruption is not necessary. This is one
weakness of Shelly’s model for transnational organized crime - failing to
realize that the weakness of states like Sudan, Ethiopia, and Egypt (ranked 3rd,
17th, and 31st respectively on the 2012 Failed States
Index) are enough for transnational criminal groups to carry out their illicit
activities.
In
order to explain how Transnational Crime continues to exist, Shelly has two
explanations relating to the local and the international levels. The first,
dealing with the local level, is the lack of civil society. In the four
countries where this human trafficking takes place, civil society is virtually nonexistent.
The 2012 Failed States Index gives civil society in Eritrea and Ethiopia a “poor”
rating, the lowest possible rating, and Sudan and Egypt a “weak” rating, the second
lowest rating. Due to the lack of civil society, crime can flourish with impunity
and few take notice of it or bring it to the attention of the world.
On
the international level, Shelly believes that globalization is another significant
force leading to the prevalence of transnational organized crime. In Eritrea, globalization
has scared the government into becoming a closed state. Today, they have a
command economy and have pursued policies that have discouraged foreign
investment and have left almost no private enterprises remaining (CIA World
Factbook). As a result, Eritrea has the 6th lowest GDP per capita in
the world and the 172nd highest GDP. To find work, Eritreans attempt
to flee the country and travel to nearby Israel, Ethiopia, and Sudan, (ranked 52nd,
73rd and 76th in GDP, respectively) during which they become
victims of human trafficking. Globalization overall has also managed to weaken most
other states, giving the human traffickers in Eritrea, Ethiopia, Sudan, and
Egypt the space that they need to flourish.
It
seems unlikely that human trafficking in the Sinai will be dealt with anytime
in the near future. As long as the severe corruption within the Eritrean government
continues, human traffickers on the other side of the border with have ample
amounts of refugees to traffic. Sudan and Ethiopia need to better police
refugee camps to stop this trafficking. However, once again due to their
weakness and inability to hold a monopoly over the legitimate use of violence,
this seems unlikely. Furthermore, Egypt must begin to prosecute Bedouins who
torture abducted refugees and hold them hostage in brutal conditions until
ransom is paid. It will be interesting to see if the Egyptian government does
attempt to attack to stop these transactions as it becomes a more stable state.
However, for the near future, human trafficking in the Sinai shows few signs of
slowing.
Works
Cited and Consulted
CIA World Factbook. “Eritrea.” Cia.gov. 2012. 5
November 2012.
< https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/er.html>
< https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/er.html>
“Failed States Index.” Foreignpolicy.com. 2012.
Fund for Peace. 5 November 2012.
<www.foreignpolicy.com/failed_states_index_2012_interactive>
<www.foreignpolicy.com/failed_states_index_2012_interactive>
“GDP-per capita (PPP).” CIA World Factbook.
2012. CIA. 5 November 2012.
<www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html>
<www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html>
“Human Trafficking Devastating the Sinai.” In
Depth News. 2012. 5 November 2012.
<http://www.indepthnews.info/index.php/global-issues/1175-human-trafficking-devastating-the-sinai>
<http://www.indepthnews.info/index.php/global-issues/1175-human-trafficking-devastating-the-sinai>
“Human Trafficking in the Sinai.” EEPA. 2012.
European External Policy Advisors. 5 November 2012.
<http://www.eepa.be/wcm/dmdocuments/publications/report_Human_Trafficking_in_the_Sinai_20120928.pdf>
<http://www.eepa.be/wcm/dmdocuments/publications/report_Human_Trafficking_in_the_Sinai_20120928.pdf>
Naim, Moises. “The Five Wars of Globalization.”
Foreign Policy Magazine. February 2001.
Shelly, Louise, Picarelli, John, Corpora, Chris. “Globalized
Crime Inc.” Thomson Wadsworth: New York, 2007.
What a horrible practice! Thank you for talking about this issue. It sounds like there is not one, but many transnational crimes, happening here. Human trafficking, arms smuggling, money laundering, etc. When there are many issues contributing to a situation like this, where should the international community start? In your opinion, in which order do these problems need to be addressed and how?
ReplyDeleteGreat question Madison! You are right that there are several transnational crimes happening, but I believe that the overarching one that must be dealt with first is the human trafficking. This is the worst and most prevalent of the crimes and is the source of most of the criminal groups’ incomes. If human trafficking is stopped then the trafficking of guns would stop because both of these generally occur through the same channels. Furthermore, money laundering would be dealt with as well because the criminal groups would have no money to launder. The problem is how to stop the human trafficking. Possibly an international organization between the four countries to promote cooperation and the sharing of intelligence would help. However, more attention needs to be paid to the problem by international organizations, and more pressure must be put on the governments of Sudan, Ethiopia, and Egypt to deal with human traffickers. There must be serious repercussions for Eritrea’s support of and involvement in human trafficking as well. Sanctions imposed by the international community would be a good start as well as halting or cutting back aid to the Eritrean government.
Deletehttp://lmgtfy.com/?q=corruption+stats+for+ethiopia+sudan
Delete:)
You mentioned in your post that Shelley claims corruption is a necessity for transnational criminal organizations to flourish. However, as you mentioned, there has been no evidence of corruption in the countries of Sudan, Ethiopia, and Egypt. Do you then believe that Shelley was incorrect in assuming corruption was a necessity for the existence of transnational organized crime, or simply that there has not been extensive evidence of such occurrences yet?
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot for the comment Victor that’s an excellent question! It is hard to say if there is corruption taking place between the human traffickers and the governments of Egypt, Ethiopia, and Sudan. Although no reports have been published, this does not mean that corruption does not take place. Furthermore, corruption does take place in Eritrea, meaning that at least some level of corruption is present and aiding the criminal groups. Therefore, it is hard to say if Shelley is wrong or not. However, at this point in time for this specific example of transnational organized crime, it does appear that Shelley has at least missed a piece of what is necessary for transnational organized crime to operate effectively. State failure or inability to deal with transnational criminal groups appears to be enough to allow transnational organized crime to take place without the existence of corruption. We saw this with global prohibition regimes as well - a major shortcoming of some regimes is the inability of some states to deal with the activity the regime is targeting. To apply this to the broader world of transnational organized crime, it may be possible to say that if a transnational organized crime occurs only in states that are too weak to effectively deal with the crime, then corruption is unnecessary. This is a hypothesis at best though.
DeleteThank you for the post! You stated that a failure in civil society was a large contributer to why human trafficking continues to strongly exist. How would you explain the success of human trafficking and other transnational crime that is able to enter stable states with a strong civil society?
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment Valerie! Poor civil society is only one contributing factor to the continued existence of human trafficking; if there is transnational crime in a state with a strong civil society there are most likely various alternate features of the state that allow transnational crime to continue. One, for example, could be a weakened government as a result of globalization, or even state failure which can have a litany of causes. If states are too weak, they may be incapable of stopping transnational crime. Corrupt states can also aid transnational crime by looking the other way in exchange for payment or even partaking in the crime. Complicity of law enforcement helps as well. In the case of more developed states, however, these explanations may not be sufficient or even true to a large extent. Some transnational crime, even with the existence of civil society and a strong government, is just incredibly difficult to stop. For example, drugs are easy to conceal and thus drug trafficking has proved nearly impossible to control to any significant degree all over the world. Civil society is important because it can be the catalyst for a global prohibition regime that targets the specific transnational crime taking place. However, the existence of civil society in no way guarantees that the crime will be halted. In fact, many regimes do fail or have only limited success because of many of the factors I have already mentioned, namely state failure, complicity, and difficulty in policing.
DeleteYou said that Shelly claims that globalization also plays into transnational crime. However, it seems as though Eritrea has resisted globalization, therefore it is not prevelant in their society. Futher, perhaps the lack of globalization in Eritrea that is contributing to its poor GDP is directly feeding into the human trafficking, which would go against Shelly's claim. Can you explain further how you think globalization has fed into human trafficking in the Sinai?
ReplyDelete